The District of Delaware has produced another opinion in the recent line of cases considering motions to transfer venue, this time denying a motion to transfer to the Eastern District of Texas in Microsoft Corp. v. Geotag Inc., C.A. No. 11-175-RGA (Jan. 13, 2012). Much like Judge Andrew’s recent decision in Wacoh Co. v. KionixContinue reading “Judge Andrews Denies Motion to Transfer Venue”
Category Archives: Richard G. Andrews
Judge Andrews Distinguishes Fed. Cir.’s Decision in Link_A_Media, Grants Defendants’ Motions to Transfer on Other Grounds
In Wacoh Co. v. Kionix Inc., C.A. No. 10-617-RGA, Judge Andrews recently granted defendants’ motions to transfer after distinguishing the Fed. Cir.’s decision in In re Link_A_Media Devices Corp. and concluding that the “balance of convenience” factors nonetheless tipped in defendants’ favor. Id. at 13. In Wacoh, the plaintiff, a Japanese corporation with its principalContinue reading “Judge Andrews Distinguishes Fed. Cir.’s Decision in Link_A_Media, Grants Defendants’ Motions to Transfer on Other Grounds”
Judge Andrews Considers Failure to Prosecute Claim, Orders Monetary Sanction Rather Than Immediate Dismissal
Judge Andrews recently issued a memorandum opinion in the case of WebXChange Inc. v. Dell Inc., et al., Civ. No. 08-132-RGA (D. Del. Dec. 15, 2011). WebXChange sued Dell and Federal Express for patent infringement, but has had a history of “irreconcilable-and total-breakdown[s] in the client-lawyer relationship.” Id. at 2-4. The defendants sought dismissal ofContinue reading “Judge Andrews Considers Failure to Prosecute Claim, Orders Monetary Sanction Rather Than Immediate Dismissal”