Following a successful inception in 2014, Premier Cercle™ is teaming up with Institutional Investor Magazine and Managing Intellectual Property to organize a sequel of the IP Finance Conference that will showcase and discuss the best practices from patent holders, entitled, investors, bankers, financiers, Private Equity, firms, regulators, plaintiffs and defendants which make the most ofContinue reading “Managing IP Finance Conference offering special discount to followers of Delaware IP Law Blog”
Category Archives: General
Verdict in Intellectual Ventures v. Motorola Mobility, 11-908-SLR
On March 24, the jury in Intellectual Ventures v. Motorola Mobility, C.A. No. 11-908-SLR, returned a verdict of direct, contributory, and induced infringement for plaintiff for one of the patents-in-suit. For the patent the jury found not infringed, it also found that this patent was invalid as obvious. UPDATE: The Court released an additional verdict sheetContinue reading “Verdict in Intellectual Ventures v. Motorola Mobility, 11-908-SLR”
Second Jury Verdict of the Day: Intellectual Ventures wins $17M from Symantec
(Feb. 6, 2015 ) In the second verdict of the day from the District of Delaware, a jury awarded Intellectual Ventures I LLC a sum of $17 million from Symantec Corporation for infringement of two of three asserted patents, in the case of Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corporation, C.A. No. 10-1067-LPS. 2015.02.06 VerdictContinue reading “Second Jury Verdict of the Day: Intellectual Ventures wins $17M from Symantec”
Verdict in Round Rock Research v. Sandisk, 12-569-SLR
On January 27, 2015, the jury in Round Rock Research, LLC v. Sandisk Corporation, C.A. No. 12-569-SLR returned a verdict finding infringement of some claims, but invalidity as to both patents-in-suit. The jury found some asserted claims of both patents-in-suit had been directly infringed, but none of the asserted claims were indirectly infringed. However, the juryContinue reading “Verdict in Round Rock Research v. Sandisk, 12-569-SLR”
Verdict for plaintiffs in Interdigital v. ZTE, No. 13-009-RGA
On Tuesday, the jury in Interdigital Communications, Inc., et al. v. ZTE Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 13-009-RGA (D. Del. Oct. 28, 2014) returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, finding all asserted claims of the three patents-in-suit infringed and not invalid.
Verdict in Comcast IP Holdings v. Sprint, No. 12-205-RGA
This week, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC v. Sprint Communications Company L.P., et al., C.A. No. 12-205-RGA-CJB (D. Del. Oct. 15, 2014). The jury found that plaintiff had proven infringement of all asserted claims and awarded $7.5 million in damages.
Verdict for plaintiff in Masimo Corporation v. Philips, C.A. No. 09-80-LPS
This week, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in this case. Masimo Corporation v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation, et al., C.A. No. 09-80-LPS (D. Del. Oct. 1, 2014). The jury found plaintiff’s patents not invalid as anticipated, obvious, for lack of written description, not enabled, and indefinite. Furthermore, the jury found thatContinue reading “Verdict for plaintiff in Masimo Corporation v. Philips, C.A. No. 09-80-LPS”
Jury returns infringement verdict in Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Riverbed Technology, Inc.
On April 1, 2014, a jury returned a verdict in Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Riverbed Technology, Inc., C.A. No. 11-484-RGA-CJB (D. Del.), finding that Riverbed Technology, Inc. (“Riverbed”) infringed certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,945,736 (the “’736 Patent”) and 7,948,921 (the “’921 Patent”) asserted by Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Specifically, the jury foundContinue reading “Jury returns infringement verdict in Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Riverbed Technology, Inc.”
Jury Finds No Infringement by Google, Invalidates Personalized User Model Patents
In the longstanding patent and contract action between Personalized User Model and Google, a jury returned a verdict last week. The verdict form shows that the jury found no literal infringement by any Google product of any asserted claim and that the jury found both anticipation and obviousness for each asserted claim. In addition, theContinue reading “Jury Finds No Infringement by Google, Invalidates Personalized User Model Patents”
Last Chance to Register: Managing IP US Patent Forum March 25, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
There is still time to register for Managing IP’s third annual US Patent Forum on March 25 at the Willard InterContinental, Washington D.C. ** Free for in-house patent counsel, academics and R&D professionals ** Supported by AIPLA and Delaware IP Law Blog, the forum will provide you with: • a guide to improving your company’sContinue reading “Last Chance to Register: Managing IP US Patent Forum March 25, 2014 in Washington, D.C.”
Delaware IP Law Blog 